AI-Powered Supply Chain
HPE
My Role
AI-Powered Supply Chain Platform for Ethical Gold Sourcing
I led the design of a 0→1 AI-powered platform to prevent illegally sourced gold from entering the global supply chain.
The initiative evolved from a transactional tracking tool into a scalable provenance platform that automated authentication using AI visual recognition and enabled multi-stakeholder coordination across miners, logistics operators, and refiners.
Strategic Context
Illegal gold mining contributes to environmental destruction, human rights violations, and global compliance risk.
Problem Statement
How might we design a scalable, trusted digital platform that enables secure provenance verification across distributed stakeholders with minimal friction?
Design Process
Defining the Platform Vision
Rather than designing a single-use app, I reframed the initiative as a multi-actor platform ecosystem supporting:
- Source registration (miners)
- Transit validation (logistics operators)
- Refinement authentication (refiners)
- Compliance traceability (regulators, enterprise buyers)This shift elevated the product from a workflow tool to a platformized transaction layer for ethical sourcing.
Multi-Sided User Architecture
Through facilitated workshops with PM, engineering, and compliance leaders, I led the creation of a structured persona framework grounded in:
Through our workshops, we established four criteria for persona development:
Miners
Register gold at origin
Require simple, low-friction capture flows
Operate in limited connectivity environments

Logistics Operators
Validate custody transfers
Track shipments across regions
Require bulk processing efficiency

Refiners
Authenticate origin
Validate documentation
Ensure regulatory compliance

Storytelling
To ensure cross-functional understanding, I created storyboards and process flow based on contextual inquiries. I mapped the user journey to highlight pain points and opportunities for our solution to alleviate them. This method allowed stakeholders to step into users’ shoes and empathize with their experiences, aligning the team around a cohesive conceptual model before moving to wireframe.

Phase 1: Minimal Viable Experience (MVE)
With the help of the product owner, developers, and QA engineers, we brainstormed to determine usability goals and define the main elements and actions the application should provide for the first release.
Defining Usability Goals

Defining Objects and Actions

Ideation
I created low-fidelity wireframes to validate assumptions with my team.

First Iteration
The initial version relied on RFID tagging for identification.
While functional, it exposed systemic issues:
- Manual labor at scale
- Seal tampering risk
- Repetitive low-value tasks
- Limited differentiation
This revealed a core insight:
The bottleneck was not tracking — it was authentication friction.


Phase 2: AI-Driven Automation (0→1 Pivot)
I identified an opportunity to replace physical seals with AI visual recognition, enabling:
- Unique fingerprinting of gold bars
- Image-based registration
- Automated verification
- Reduced tampering risk
- Scalable authentication
This pivot transformed the product from a workflow-optimization solution to an AI-powered identity infrastructure.

AI Product Strategy
I led structured ideation sessions to:
-
Identify repetitive manual tasks suitable for automation
-
Map human + AI collaboration touchpoints
-
Define explainability requirements
-
Establish trust feedback loops
Workflow to identify tasks to automate with AI

Example of Brainstorming Ideas Through Sketching

Proof of concept
After brainstorming, I created a proof of concept for the developers and the product manager. I did this at the end of my time in Quenta, and I don’t have any information on the next stage of this initiative.


Key Design Considerations
AI feedback loop: Instead of designing a static interface, I architected a dynamic feedback loop that leverages user corrections to fuel platform growth.
Human Override Workflows
I designed override flows that allowed users to:
- Reject a match
- Correct discrepancies

Confidence Scoring Transparency
When the AI visually recognized a gold bar, it generated a probability score indicating the model’s confidence in the match.
Instead of treating AI as a black box, I designed the interface to:
-
- Display a clear confidence percentage (e.g., 98% match)
- Provide contextual explanations (e.g., Matched based on surface markings and edge patterns.)
- Use visual indicators (color states/thresholds)

Final Solution
Light theme


Dark theme


Prototype
Design Impact
Challenges Faced
For this project, I had to
- Aligned engineering feasibility with product vision
- Advocated for platform scalability over short-term feature wins
Also, to elevate my design role from execution to strategic contributor, I am proactively learning the fundamentals of two technologies:
- Blockchain
- AI visual recognition
This enabled me to participate credibly in architectural discussions.
